Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 30, 2008No. 01CR0698; A126149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Miller, 214 Or App 494, 166 P3d 591 (2007), in which we rejected his contentions that the trial court erred in denying his motion for substitute counsel, in instructing the jury that it could convict by less than a unanimous jury, and in imposing consecutive sentences without submitting to a jury findings that are necessary to support such a sentence. On reconsideration, he first argues that we erred in rejecting the first of those contentions. We reject that argument without discussion. He also argues that, in light of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. HagstromCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API