Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 2007No. 01CR0698, A126149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of first-degree sodomy, first-degree rape, second-degree kidnapping, and unlawful use of a weapon. He now appeals, assigning error to (1) the trial court’s decision to deny his motion for substitute counsel and instead require him to proceed pro se during the first day of trial; (2) the imposition of consecutive sentences without submitting the issue to a jury; and (3) the trial court’s instruction to the jury that it could convict by less than a unanimous jury and its entry of judgment on a less than unanimous verdict. We reject each of those…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. CableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API