Legal Opinion

State v. Hagstrom

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 2011No. C072014CR; A140120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of second-degree assault, ORS 163.175, and two counts of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160. On appeal, he contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in allowing “defendant to proceed pro se without obtaining a valid waiver of counsel” and in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA) on the count of second-degree assault. An extended recitation of the facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand.

“[B]ecause the relief for an erroneously denied MJOA — entry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. LavadoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API