M. Perez Co. v. Base Camp Condominiums Ass'n No. One
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
In this construction defects dispute, the general contractor, Kerry Meeker, doing business as Kerry Meeker Construction (Meeker), appeals from a postjudgment order denying his request for litigation expenses from the property owner, Base Camp Condominiums Association No. One (Base Camp), and a subcontractor, M. Perez Company, Inc., doing business as Henley & Company (Henley). The court concluded that Meeker failed to establish the existence of a contract containing a provision that would permit the recovery of litigation expenses. Henley also appeals from the order, contending…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cytodyn of New Mexico, Inc. v. Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Blix Street Records, Inc. v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.