Legal Opinion

Cytodyn of New Mexico, Inc. v. Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 2008No. B187661PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

SUMMARY

The trial court erred in awarding attorney fees under a provision of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civ. Code, § 3426 et seq.), which authorizes an award of fees if a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets is made in bad faith. Plaintiff’s complaint asserted a claim for unjust enrichment based on the alleged misappropriation of its patents and trademarks, and erroneously requested damages under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. However, the complaint cannot be read as alleging a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets. The court also erred in concluding that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StuetzleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alta Devices, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Mintz v. Mark Bartelstein & Associates Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API