Pure Oil Co. v. Gear
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action to'recover for damage alleged to have been sustained as a result of the poisoning of plaintiffs’ cattle by salt water which defendant had permitted to flow from its oil well to a receiving pond or earthen tank. The cause was tried to a jury. Motion of defendant for judgment based on the opening statement of counsel for plaintiffs was denied. Demurrer to the evidence of plaintiffs and a motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence were likewise overruled. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, upon which judgment was rendered, and defendant brings this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tidal Oil Co. v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Marland Oil Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Texas Co. v. MosshamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Warren Petroleum Corp. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- General Crude Oil Company v. AikenTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Sanford v. Arjay Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- McClaren v. G. S. Robins & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.