Bardeen v. Commander Oil Co., Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action to quiet title to a leasehold estate and for an accounting, plaintiff appeals.
So far as material here, the essential facts are:
August 23, 1938, plaintiff commenced the present action, which is in three counts. The first is a simple cause of action to quiet title to a leasehold. The second is the same as the first, except that it alleges a number of defaults by defendants. The third is substantially a repetition of the second cause of action with the addition of paragraphs relative to a request for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lady v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bardeen v. Commander Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Romrell v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- The People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Martin v. ChernabaeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hine v. CarmichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.