Legal Opinion

Jacobi v. Baur

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,647PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying a motion by defendant to strike out the cost bill of the plaintiff, in the Twenty-Second District Court, County of Sonoma. Temple, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court:

This was an action to recover damages for slander. The plaintiff had a verdict for one dollar. He filed a memorandum of costs and disbursements amounting to $390.25, which defendant moved to strike out. This motion was denied by the Court and defendant excepted. Defendant appealed from the.judgment, and the order denying his motion above mentioned.

We arc of opinion that the Court erred in denying the motion. The seventh section of the Act of 23rd of March, 1872, entitled an act concerning actions for libel and slander, (Statutes of 1871-72, p. 533) does not give plaintiff recovering…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lady v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. McKinney v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Engel v. EhretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Rapfogel v. KlassenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API