Legal Opinion
Public Employees' Retirement System v. Stanley
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 6, 2009No. Case CV 08-01469 MRP (FMOx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING Defendants’ Motion to Transfer and DECLINING TO ADDRESS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand
Mariana R. PFAELZER, District Judge.
I
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi (“Plaintiff’) sues Defendants regarding mortgage-backed securities. Plaintiff filed in California state court, asserting only violations of the federal Securities Act of 1933 (“the '33 Act”). Defendants removed to federal court.
Plaintiffs move to remand under Luther v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, 533 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2008), which holds that the '33 Act’s removal bar, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Luther v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Menowitz v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re LimitNone, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Katz v. GerardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chanielle Enomoto v. Siemens Industry, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Enomoto v. Siemens Industry, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Fifer v. ADP Screening and Selection Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Gaarder v. Webster UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- Hicks v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.