Legal Opinion
Katz v. Gerardi
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 5, 2009No. 08-8031PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Jack Katz proposes to represent a class of persons who contributed real property (or interests in real property) to the Arch-stone real estate investment trust, in exchange for interests called “A-l Units.” In 2007 Archstone merged into Tishman-Lehman Partnership. Holders of A-l Units were offered a choice of cash or Series 0 Preferred Units in the entity formed by the merger. Katz contends that the merger violated the terms of the A-l Units, because neither cash nor the Series 0 Preferred Units offered investors the same tax benefits as A-l Units. After a majority of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Fairley v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Katz v. GerardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Appert v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.