Legal Opinion

Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 2007No. 06-102PublishedCited by 1,943 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

This case concerns the doctrine of forum non conveniens, under which a federal district court may dismiss an action on the ground that a court abroad is the more appropriate and convenient forum for adjudicating the controversy. We granted review to decide a question that has divided the Courts of Appeals: “[wjhether a district court must first conclusively establish [its own] jurisdiction before dismissing a suit on the ground of forum non conveniens?” Pet. for Cert. i. We hold that a district court has discretion to respond at once to a defendant’s forum non conveniens plea, and need not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,943 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lane v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Shaker Aamer v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

1,938 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API