Legal Opinion
In Re LimitNone, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 2008No. 08-3499PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Per curiam
In this intellectual-property dispute, the district court ordered the case transferred to the Northern District of California on the basis of forum-selection clauses in two of the contracts between the parties. Lim-itNone, LLC, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to vacate the transfer order. Because LimitNone has not shown an indisputable right to the relief it seeks, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
I. Background
LimitNone is a software development and consulting company. Google, Inc., the real party in interest, also in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Aftab v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Tommy Morris v. Salvatore NuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Pamela Whitaker v. Monroe Staffing Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- In re HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.