Legal Opinion
Menowitz v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 29, 1993No. Nos. 1023, 1024, Dockets 92-7867, 92-9149PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-appellants in these three actions (“Menowitz,” “Spritzler” and “Drooker ”), consolidated in the Southern District of New York before Judge McKen-na, assert federal claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k and 77o, Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, id. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated pursuant to § 10(b), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, as well as supplemental state law claims. Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgments dismissing their complaints.
Plaintiffs purchased registered subordinated debentures…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- W. Kenneth Tregenza, James E. Haas, and Erwin B. Seegers v. Great American Communications Company and Shearson Lehman Brothers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BroxmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.