Legal Opinion
Riverwatch v. County of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 2000No. D030732PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Real parties in interest and appellants Palomar Aggregates, Inc., and William Pankey (collectively Palomar) would like to develop a rock quarry on Rosemary’s Mountain in the northeastern portion of San Diego County. After its initial application for a major use permit was opposed by officials of defendant and appellant the County of San Diego (the county), Palomar prepared a revised application, which the county eventually approved. Plaintiff and respondent Riverwatch, an unincorporated association of residents and taxpayers who live near the proposed quarry and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- The Pocket Protectors v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.