Legal Opinion
San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1994No. F019841PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
Appellants San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center and John Mataka appeal from the judgment entered denying their complaint and petition for writ of mandate challenging the approval by respondent County of Stanislaus (County) of a proposal by respondent Arambel and Rose Development, Inc. (Arambel), to build a residential development near the existing community of Grayson, California. Appellants contend the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared in connection with the project did not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
We will reverse. In so…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- ASS'N OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.