Legal Opinion
The Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 2004No. C046247PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff The Pocket Protectors, an unincorporated association, appeals from the denial of its petition for writ of mandamus under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.; undesignated section references are to the Public Resources Code). The Pocket Protectors seek the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a residential project called The Islands at Riverlake proposed by real party in interest Regis Homes of Northern California, Inc. (Regis). Defendant Sacramento City Council voted to approve the project with…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Porterville Citizens for Responsible Hillside Development v. City of PortervilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.