Legal Opinion
Oreck v. Harvey Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 23, 1999No. C5-99-752PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant homeowners, Michael and Susan Oreck, challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents Harvey Homes, Inc. and JBL Plastering, Inc. The Orecks contend the district court erred in applying the two-year statute of limitations under Minn. Stat. § 541.051 (1996) to their breach of contract and breach of warranty claims and in dismissing their equitable estoppel claim. Because we conclude the district court properly applied the statute of limitations and the Orecks have failed to establish a claim of equitable estoppel, we affirm.
FACTS
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Griese v. KampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Dakota County v. BWBR Architects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.