Legal Opinion
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 2006No. A05-634PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant asserts that the district court erred by applying section 3-307 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (Minn. Stat. § 336.3-307 (2004)) and its three-year limitation period (Minn.Stat. § 336.3-118(g) (2004)) to her claim rather than section 8 of the Uniform Fiduciary Act (UFA) (Minn.Stat. § 520.08 (2004)) and the general Minnesota six-year statute of limitations (Minn.Stat. § 541.05 (2004)), and by rejecting her common law claims. 1 Further, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by considering respondent’s summary judgment motion and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zirnhelt v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Chase Cardholder Services, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
- Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Merrick Bank Corp.United States District Court · 2019
- Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015