Dakota County v. BWBR Architects, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the grant of summary judgment to respondents, dismissing its claims for damages for defects to real property arising out of a construction project. Because more than two years passed after appellant should reasonably have discovered an actionable injury, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. Further, because any fraud or misrepresentation by respondents, which could have tolled the statute of limitations or estopped respondents from raising the statute of limitations as a defense, occurred before the discovery…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Cohen v. AppertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Rene Julian McKenzie v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.