Legal Opinion

City Savings Bank v. Dessoff

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 30, 1985No. 2346PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The named defendant, Andreas Dessoff,1 appeals2 from a judgment of foreclosure by sale of a mortgage on his condominium and from the subsequent order of the court opening that judgment and setting new law days for strict foreclosure. Dessoff raises four issues by this appeal: (1) That the trial court erred in failing to rule on his equitable special defense that tender of all past and currently due installments prior to institution of a foreclosure action is a bar thereto; (2) that this special defense is valid as a matter of law; (3) that the trial court erred in refusing to clarify its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Stage Harbor CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Alderman v. Hanover Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Cochran v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Barrier v. Marine Midland Trust Co. of Southern New YorkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. McLaughlin v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Webster Bank v. OakleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Phipps v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API