Alderman v. Hanover Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The subordinate facts found by the court are not contested. They disclose that this controversy arose as follows: The plaintiff, under the trade name of Alderman-Dow Iron and Metal Company, was engaged in the scrap iron and metal business, which included the processing of materials on the plaintiff’s premises, as well as the collection and removal of industrial scrap and boilers away from the premises. Prior to March 27, 1961, the defendant had issued to the plaintiff’s decedent, Abraham J. Alderman, a manufacturers’ and con tractors’ schedule liability policy covering the period from March…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Harty v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- O'Brien v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Fogarty v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gauvin v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Alderman v. Hanover Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Testone v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.