Legal Opinion
Webster Bank v. Oakley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 2, 2003No. SC 16851PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The named defendant, Loma T. Oakley,1 appeals2 from a judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Webster Bank. In this appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly concluded that: (1) the plaintiff clearly and unequivocally had exercised its option, under the mortgage, to accelerate the defendant’s loan; and (2) the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 *542et seq.,3 and the state fair housing laws, General…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Parker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Szewczyk v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Nussbaum v. Kimberly Timbers, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.