Legal Opinion
United States v. ESIC Capital, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 13, 1988No. Civ. JH-85-4779PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH C. HOWARD, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a petition for declaratory relief (Paper # 48) filed by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”), as receiver for ESIC Capital, Inc. (“ESIC”). Ms. Lynn Garon has responded with her opposition to the petition for declaratory relief and has filed a cross-petition to lift stay. (Paper #49-1/2). The SBA has replied. (Paper # 52). The matter is ready for disposition and no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 6(G).
ESIC is a small business investment company, licensed under Section 301(c) of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Telemart Enterprises, Inc., Bankrupt. Alfred M. Lewis, Inc. v. Lawrence Holzman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,679 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Palmer York, Jr. And George Croke, and Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sager v. BurgessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,533 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke Superior Motels, Inc. v. R. N. Gould and Securities and Exchange Commission, Receiver and Real Party in Interest AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Acorn Technology Fund, L.P. Leonard Barrack and Lynne BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fairway Capital Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
- Federal Trade Commission v. Med Resorts International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- United States v. Acorn Tech FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005