Legal Opinion
Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 37995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUR PETITION OF THE JOSCAR COMPANY FOR PERMISSION TO ISSUE EXECUTION, ETC. (Document 77) AND ANSWER TO THAT PETITION (Document 84)
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation).
By order of May 11, 1965 (Document 6), Leon J. Obermayer was appointed:
“ * * * Conservator pursuant to Rule 66 of the Rules of Federal Procedure to investigate all aspects of the * * * saje an(j determine whether the sale made by Sun Ray to Marrud, Incorporated, under the Sale Agreement is in the best interest of creditors, and to take appropriate action in the interest of creditors before this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Northumberland County Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- United Security Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- United States v. ESIC Capital, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
- Modart, Inc. v. Penrose Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Reichert v. Reichert, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1970