Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,679 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke, Palmer York, Jr. And George Croke, and Real Parties in Interest

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1984No. 83-6165PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Palmer York, Jr. and George E. Croke appeal the district court’s refusal to lift its stay preventing the commencement of their suit against the Wencke receivership. We reverse.

In 1982, Portsmouth Square, Inc. (PSI) sought to remedy its serious financial difficulties by making a deal with Walker Wencke, a self-proclaimed expert on saving financially troubled companies. Wencke, through his company RAMAPO, concluded an agreement with PSI pursuant to which PSI received $10,000 and an implied promise of Wencke’s services in exchange for stock representing a controlling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,533 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Wencke Superior Motels, Inc. v. R. N. Gould and Securities and Exchange Commission, Receiver and Real Party in Interest AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vescor Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Acorn Technology Fund, L.P. Leonard Barrack and Lynne BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Chizzali v. Gindi (In Re Gindi)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Carney v. BerachaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API