Legal Opinion

Eistrat v. Humiston

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1957No. Civ. 5392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Plaintiffs filed two actions for declaratory relief in the Superior Court of Tulare County, which actions are numbered 42418 and 46892. The pleadings in action Number 46892 are not included in the record herein. However, the trial court found that the first cause of action set forth in plaintiffs’ amendment to the eighth amended complaint in action Number 42418 is predicated upon the same facts as set forth in plaintiffs’ amended complaint in action Number 46892 and that the cross-complaint of William I. Humiston, filed in action 46892, is predicated upon the same facts as set forth in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richee v. Gillette Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Oakes v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Norman Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Simmons v. PatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Eistrat v. Irving Lumber & Moulding, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Eistrat v. HumistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API