Legal Opinion

Eistrat v. Humiston

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1958No. Civ. 5656PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In an action by plaintiff and his wife against defendants William I. Humiston and Marjorie Humiston, husband and wife, plaintiffs recovered judgment against William I. Humiston alone for $19,157.46, plus interest and costs. The court denied judgment against Marjorie Humiston and allowed costs in her favor. Plaintiffs were denied allowance for claimed attorney’s fees alleged to be due them on the note involved, because no attorney’s fees had been actually incurred. Plaintiffs appealed from that part of the judgment denying them such attorney’s fees, holding that Mrs. Humiston was not liable on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Meherin v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Stephen Raymond Strand Kristie Gale Strand, Debtors, Bruce Leichty v. William T. Neary, United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Advance Industrial Finance Co. v. Western Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Jimenez v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Eistrat v. Irving Lumber & Moulding, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Pioneer Title Insurance v. GuttmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API