Legal Opinion

Richee v. Gillette Realty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1929No. Docket No. 5164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

A complaint was filed in the court below to recover on two promissory notes, which are set out in haeo verba, each containing the following clause: “And in case suit or action is instituted to collect this note, the Gillette Bealty Company, a corporation promises to pay, besides the costs and disbursements allowed by law, such additional gum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney’s fees in such suit or action.” The prayer of the complaint is for the amount of the notes, interest and such attorney’s fees as the court may adjudge reasonable. The defendant, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Rooney v. Gray Bros.California Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Krieger v. FeenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Eistrat v. HumistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Oakes v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API