Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Fernandez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1951No. Civ. 18512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.—The

judgment in this action quieted plaintiffs’ title to Lots 234 and 235 of Tract 4949, and awarded them $11,800 with interest against defendant Tomasa M. Fernandez. The $11,800 consisted of $4,300 and $6,500 unpaid on two promissory notes, and $1,000 attorney’s fees as provided in the notes. Defendants appeal.

Defendants apparently contend that the findings are not supported by the evidence. The point is untenable. On September 12, 1949, the marshal of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles conveyed Lot 234 to plaintiff J. A. Oakes, pursuant to a sale on execution in an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. O'RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Richee v. Gillette Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Eistrat v. HumistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API