Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Norman Industrial Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 2001No. 93,624PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.:
11 Certiorari was granted to consider a single issue 1 of first impression: 2 whether the language of 27 0.8.1991 § 11 3 -providing for an award of attorney fees "actually incurred"-prohibits the addition of an incentive or bonus fee to the attorney fees' award in a condemnation proceeding in which the fee obligation is governed by contract. We determine that it does.
RELEVANT FACTS 4
€ 2 The district court appointed a panel of commissioners who recommended that the appellant, Department of Transportation (DOT), pay $77,550 to the appellees, Norman Industrial Development Corporation,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. JOA, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Apache Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
- STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Silver Creek Investments, Inc. v. Whitten Construction Management, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.