Legal Opinion
Henneghan v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2009No. Civil Action 07-2173 (HHK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss the pro se complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff opposes the motion and restates in detail the factual allegations supporting his claims. Because the defendant’s motion to dismiss lacks merit in law and fact, it will be denied.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, proceeding in forma pau-peris and pro se, filed a complaint against the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) for “discrimination and retaliation ... on the basis of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hinson Ex Rel. N.H. v. Merritt Educational CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- CareFirst, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Cooper v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Miller v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.