Crowley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The question presented is whether . medical care provided a member of the armed forces pursuant to 10 USC 1071 et seq. is a benefit provided under the laws of the federal government required to be subtracted from medical no-fault benefits otherwise payable where neither the injured person, his spouse, nor a relative domiciled *273in the same household owns an automobile insured under the no-fault act. We hold that amounts paid by the United States government for medical care furnished a member of the armed forces are benefits required to be provided under the laws of the federal government…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morgan v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Great Lakes American Life Insurance v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tatum v. Government Employees InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- DeMeglio v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Morgan v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.