Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1987No. 77380, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented is whether . medical care provided a member of the armed forces pursuant to 10 USC 1071 et seq. is a benefit provided under the laws of the federal government required to be subtracted from medical no-fault benefits otherwise payable where neither the injured person, his spouse, nor a relative domiciled *273in the same household owns an automobile insured under the no-fault act. We hold that amounts paid by the United States government for medical care furnished a member of the armed forces are benefits required to be provided under the laws of the federal government…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Great Lakes American Life Insurance v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Tatum v. Government Employees InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DeMeglio v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Morgan v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API