Legal Opinion

Louie v. Pier 39 Limited Partnership

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 29, 2022No. 3:22-cv-03868Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANGELITA LOUIE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03868-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEY'S FEES PIER 39 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants. The motion for attorney’s fees is denied. The parties’ lease provides: “Subject to the provisions of Section 24.9 [the arbitration provision], in any dispute resolution or other proceeding, including any action brought for a declaration of rights under or to enforce the provisions of this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disputesuite, LLC v. Scoreinc.comCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. S. Cal. Fin. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. City of W. Hollywood v. Kihagi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Terra Nova Industries, Inc. v. Chen (In Re Chen)District Court, N.D. California · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API