Legal Opinion

State v. Wye

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

The first assignment of error contends that the court erred when it overruled the defendant’s demurrer to the indictment; particularly the demurrer charged:

“(c) The indictment is not direct or certain as regards, nor does it charge, the particular circumstances of the alleged crime.
“(d) The indictment does not state the act or omission charged as the crime with such a degree of certainty as to enable the court to pronounce judgment, upon a conviction, according to the right of the case.
“ (e) The indictment does not inform the defendant as to the nature and cause of the accusation against him.”

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. GoddardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. DoughertyOregon Supreme Court · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API