Legal Opinion
Timberline, Inc. v. Jaisinghani
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1997No. B103550PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a corporation which has been suspended for failure to pay franchise taxes may avail itself of the statutory mechanisms for renewing a judgment entered while the corporation was in good standing. We hold it may not. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the judgment debtor’s motion to vacate the order renewing the judgment.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Prior to 1980 plaintiff and respondent, Timberline, Inc., was a woodworking business. In 1980 it sold all its assets to defendant and appellant, Gul Jaisinghani.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cal-Western Business Services, Inc. v. Corning Capital GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hospitality Furniture, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Grell v. Laci Le Beau Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- FIDELITY CREDITOR SERVICE, INC. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City of San Diego v. HaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.