Legal Opinion
Converse v. Udall
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 30, 1966No. Civ. 65-581, 65-590PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KILKENNY, District Judge:
FACTS IN GENERAL
These cases are considered together, as they present many common questions of law and fact. The chain of events culminating in this review began with two hearings in Portland, United States v. Converse (Contest No. O11195-D) and United States v. Independent Quick Silver Co. (Contest No. O6189-A). The hearings were initiated by the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, pursuant to Section 5 of the Act of July 23, 1955, 69 Stat. 369, as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 613 (Supp. 1965).
The statute, popularly known as the Surface Resources…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. De Luca v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kenneth Roberts v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, and the Interior Board of Land AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Campbell v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- United States v. Ned N. Richardson and Dorothy M. Richardson, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.