United States v. Ned N. Richardson and Dorothy M. Richardson, Husband and Wife
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge:
Some form of poetic justice may lie in the fact that this action arose in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest in the State of Washington, named for a man who was in the vanguard of conservationists and environmentalists.
In 1970 the appellants, Ned and Dorothy Richardson, filed notices of location for six mining claims in the Wind River Ranger District. The claims were situated at the confluence of Slide Creek and the East Fork of the Lewis River, an area reforested after a destructive fire some forty years ago. The area was heavily used by campers and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Teller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Hartman v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Rory Doremus and David DoremusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Curtis-Nevada Mines, Inc., and Robert CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States, and State of Idaho, Department of Lands, Intervenor v. E. B. Weiss, James Click, Sr., Orral W. Lake, H. G. King and Orson BaierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.