Legal Opinion
Swedowski v. Westgor
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Wilfulness not essential to recovery of double damages under sec. 26.09, Stats. 1959. Sec. 26.09, Stats. 1959, provides:
“Civil liability for unlawful cutting. In addition to the penalties provided in secs. 26.04 and 26.05, any person unlawfully cutting forest products shall be liable to the owner or to the county holding a tax certificate, or to the commissioners of public lands holding a land-contract cer tificate under the provisions of chapter 24, to the land on which the unlawful cutting was done, in a civil action, for double the amount of damages suffered. This section shall not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Single v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Cohn v. NeevesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Essock v. MawhinneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Webber v. QuawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Farley v. Spring Garden Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trible v. Tower InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Huckstorf v. Vince L. Schneider EnterprisesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Carothers v. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance v. ElmerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.