Legal Opinion

Webber v. Quaw

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Marathon County. Action for damages for cutting, carrying away and converting timber. Defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The errors alleged will sufficiently appear from the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Oetoít, J.

This action is for damages for cutting, carrying away and converting 400,000 feet of certain pine logs and timber; and the answer virtually alleges that such cutting was done by permission and license from the owner of the land.

The first exception in the record, but which was not urged upon the argument, was to the admission of the assignment, *119to the plaintiffs, of the cause of action; which may have been objected to on the ground that it was not assignable, although the record does not disclose what objection was made to its admissibility. The assignability of choses in action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. McKee v. . JuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. McArthur v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Tyson v. McGuineasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Arden v. PattersonNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. John V. Farwell Co. v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. SherryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lehmann v. FarwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Schweitzer v. ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Wright v. E. E. Bolles Wooden Ware Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API