Legal Opinion

Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance v. Elmer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 26, 1984No. 84-589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance Company appeals from that part of a final judgment wherein the trial court ruled that the provisions in an insurance policy which exclude coverage for “all punitive damages” do not exclude coverage for statutory double damages under sec. 26.09, Stats.

The issue in this case is whether a homeowner’s liability insurance policy covering “all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as compensatory damages because of bodily injury or property damage, excluding all punitive damages, caused by an occurrence to which this coverage applies”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cieslewicz Ex Rel. Finerty v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Insurance v. NemetzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  2. Berg v. FallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Landshire Fast Foods of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Marvin v. United States (In Re Marvin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Oakley v. Fireman's Fund of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API