Legal Opinion

Carothers v. Bauer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The issues involved on the instant appeal are as follows:(1) Whether the motion for summary judgment should have been denied for the reason that there are issues of fact present which require trial.(2) Whether the trial court erred in determining that Komro was an independent contractor.

The affidavits reveal the following facts. In July, 1959, Komro purchased the truck which was involved in the collision from the estate of Robert Hophan. Hophan, prior to his death, had been a bulk milk hauler under contract with the Dairy on the same milk route currently operated by Komro. The total purchase…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Nestle's Food Co. v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Estate of BealeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Huckstorf v. Vince L. Schneider EnterprisesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Borkin v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Reuter v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API