Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. State Ex Rel. Harless

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1940No. Civil No. 4124PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Superior Judge.

This action was one of quo warranto, instituted by the State of Arizona at the relation of the County Attorney of Maricopa County to try the title of Boy McCarthy, defendant in the lower court and hereinafter referred to as áppellant, to the office of member of the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa county. The appeal seeks a review of the judgment of the superior court, entered on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, whereby appellant was ousted and excluded from the office of member of said Board of Supervisors.

The factual situation as shown by the pleadings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Campbell v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCluskey v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Welch v. State Board of Social Security & WelfareArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cragin v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. RajkovichArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Adams v. Commission on Appellate Court AppointmentsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Daniels v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Nesbitt v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Shirley v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF APACHEArizona Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API