Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Rajkovich

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1953No. 5673PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the court allowed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Gustafsons, plaintiffs below, are appellants; Lillie May Rajkovich as administratrix of her deceased husband’s estate and as herself, is the appellee.

In the complaint it is alleged that each of the appellants suffered severe personal injuries, as well as damage to their car, as a result of a collision with appellee’s automobile; that appellee’s car was then being driven in a reckless, careless…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. McClure v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Westminster School Dist. of Orange County v. MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Long v. DickArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Barlage v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API