Legal Opinion
McCluskey v. Hunter
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1928No. Civil No. 2732PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
— This is a quo warranto proceeding filed originally in this court by H. S. McCluskey and its purpose is to have the defendant, William E. Hunter, adjudged guilty of usurping and unlawfully holding the office of industrial commissioner of this state and the plaintiff declared to be the person entitled thereto and receive its emoluments.
It appears from the complaint that on June 12th, 1926, the plaintiff, H. S. McCluskey, was appointed by the Governor a member of the Industrial Commission of Arizona and that immediately thereafter he qualified and entered upon the duties of the office and ever…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- The People Ex Rel. Kelly v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Thompson v. CraggTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- State v. BrinkerhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Leal v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Crawford v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Holmes v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Brimm v. Cache Valley Banking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.