Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hunt

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1917No. Civil No. 1567PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Original petition for Writ of Mandamus. Plaintiff held entitled to writ.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

The inquiry involved in this proceeding imposes upon the court the duty of determining which *445one of two persons, being rival claimants, respectively, to tbe office of Governor of this state, shall be recognized and given temporarily the status of a de facto officer. It goes no further. This solemn duty may not, in the popular comprehension, be entirely dissociated from a political aspect, but in this court it is, in its very essence, viewed strictly as a judicial question proper for the judgment of the court. The equity of the court must from the most trivial to the most solemn occasions be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. OatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Whitney v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. SULLIVAN v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API