Legal Opinion

Adams v. Commission on Appellate Court Appointments

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2011No. CV-10-0405-SAPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 This special action challenges the qualifications of three nominees to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. On January 19, 2011, we issued an order accepting jurisdiction and granting relief in part, stating that a written opinion would follow. This is that opinion.

I

¶ 2 In 2000, the voters approved Proposition 106, which amended the Arizona Constitution to require that a five-member Independent Redistricting Commission (“IRC”) draw boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts after every decennial census. The IRC must be constituted by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of braden/gabaldon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SharpArizona Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API