Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Kelley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1943No. Civ. 13781PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•SHINN, Acting P.

It is provided by section 196a of the Civil Code that ‘ ‘ The father as well as the mother, of an illegitimate child must give him support and education suitable to his circumstances. A civil suit to enforce such obligations may be maintained in behalf of a minor illegitimate child, by his mother or guardian, or by a guardian ad litem appointed upon the written application or with the consent of his mother;

Invoking this statutory right, plaintiff Patricia Louise Stevens, by her guardian ad litem, brought the, present action against Robert Leslie Kelley, alleging herself to be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Arsenault v. CarrierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Turner v. MilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API