Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1990No. F011955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DIBIASO, J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether a receiver appointed under Code of Civil Procedure section 564 may claim the attorney-client privilege with respect to communications between the receiver and his or her special counsel. We hold the receiver is entitled to the benefit of the privilege and issue a peremptory writ of mandate to the respondent court.

Facts

In October 1987, Duvel, a publicly traded Delaware corporation, merged with Statewide Check Cashing, a California corporation which operated check-cashing stores and other businesses in California and Arizona. On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Larrabee v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Solin v. O' Melveny & Myers, LLP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Dowling v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. City of Chula Vista v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API