Legal Opinion
City of Chula Vista v. Gutierrez
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 2012No. D059364PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*684Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
Mark S. Adams, a court-appointed receiver, appeals from an order awarding him a portion of the compensation he requested for his services. On appeal, Adams contends (1) the court abused its discretion in refusing to order Wachovia Mortgage (Wachovia) to pay all receivership fees because Wachovia was unjustly enriched, and (2) Wachovia is responsible for receivership fees under Health and Safety Code section 17980.7 (section 17980.7). (Undesignated statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code.) We reject Adams’s arguments, and affirm.
Wachovia has filed an unopposed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- California Federal Bank v. MatreyekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. Riverside UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Shannon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Sierra Madre v. SunTrust Mortg., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Southern California Sunbelt Developers, Inc. v. Banyan Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.