Legal Opinion

Reno v. Erickstein

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1984No. 83-414PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Plaintiffs Charles and Karyn Reno appeal from an order of the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, denying their motion for a new trial in a personal injury suit against defendant Thor Erickstein. For reasons stated below, we affirm the order of the District Court.

Charles and Karyn Reno were injured when the car in which they were riding was struck on October 31,1982, by a vehicle driven by the defendant, Thor Erickstein. The defendant admitted liability shortly after the plaintiffs filed suit. The trial was confined to the issue of damages. Plaintiffs each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Joseph F. O’TOOLE & Marjorie C. O’Toole, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ARLINGTON TRUST COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Theodore A. Harris, Father and Next Friend of Patrick Harris, a Minor v. Richard D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Halldorson v. HalldorsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ellis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State Ex Rel. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund v. BergMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Siebken v. VoderbergMontana Supreme Court · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API